National Wind Coordinating Committee
National Wind Coordinating Committee
National Wind Coordinating Committee
National Wind Coordinating Collaborative

Business Meeting #24

Meeting Summary and Action Items

December 6-8, 2000
Renaissance Madison Hotel
Seattle, WA

WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS

Facilitators: Abby Arnold and Gabe Petlin, RESOLVE, Inc.

After introductions and adoption of the agenda, Abby Arnold reviewed the purpose of the meeting:

  • Hold a panel presentation and discussion of several wind development issues of interest to the Northwest and U.S.
  • Have a presentation and discussion of the draft Non-Residential Green Market Demand Study and agree on next steps.
  • Hear recommendations and rationale for NWCC next steps on transmission.
  • Discuss draft Credit Trading Report and Principles and decide on next steps.
  • Discuss the NWCC 2001 Blue Print and agree upon activities and products.

[Refer to Attachment A for the Meeting Agenda.]

Also note that there is a participant's list from this meeting included at the end of this summary. Electronic copies of presenters' slides, handouts, and reference papers (from presenters who provide them) will be made available with the complete final meeting summary.

FUTURE NWCC MEETING DATES

2001 NWCC Meeting Dates and Locations [Modified subsequent to meeting to reflect current status]

March 15-16, 2001 Wind Economic Development Workshop, Minneapolis, MN
May 1-2, 2001 Upper Midwest Wind Transmission Workshop, Minneapolis, MN
May 10, 2001 NWCC Business Meeting #25, Washington, DC
July TBD 2001 New York State Wind Forum, TBD, New York
July TBD 2001 MA or New England Wind Forum, TBD, MA
September 26, 2001 NWCC Business Meeting #26, Montana
December 6, 2001 NWCC Business Meeting #27, New Mexico

DINNER PANEL DISCUSSION WITH RENEWABLES NORTHWEST BOARD MEMBERS AND REGIONAL GUESTS
Panel presentations and discussion of several wind development issues of interest to the Northwest.

Opening Remarks: Picture of Wind Development in the Northwest and Opportunities Ahead
Rachel Shimshak, Executive Director, Renewables Northwest Project
[Refer to weblink www.rnp.org, for the Renewable's Northwest Project (RNP) publication "Powerful Choices."

Rachel Shimshak described the landscape of power generation and opportunities for renewable energy in the Northwest. The Northwest is powered by about 40% fossil fuels and a large amount of hydro. Until recent energy price fluctuations the region traditionally enjoyed low cost electricity. Wind power has been making a lot of progress in recent months. Mrs. Shimshak described the efforts of RNP as a combination of "programs, policies, and persistence" aimed at promoting renewables.

Panel One: Factors for Wind Development in the Northwest
What are some examples and reasons for recent wind development activity in the Northwest?

George Darr, Manager of Renewable Resources, Bonneville Power Authority
[Refer to attachment B, George Darr's Presentation]

Mr. Darr sites three factors driving the boom in wind power in the Northwest:

1. Demand for electricity is expected to grow.
2. The cost of wind power is declining.
3. Natural gas prices are rising.

Heidi Wills, Seattle City Council Member, Chair of Energy and Environmental Policy Committee
[Refer to attachment C, Council Member Heidi Will's Presentation]

Both Council Member Wills and Nancy Glaser spoke about different aspects of Seattle City Light Municipal Utility's RFP for 100 MW of 100% renewable power recently issued.

  • The region has seen the price of electricity? go from $20 per MWhr to $8,000 per MWhr.
  • Utility has a customer load base of 1,200 MW.
  • Seattle City Light did a poll of their customers to understand their preferences.
  • The policy decision was to meet Seattle City Light's energy needs with no net green house gas (GHG) emissions.
  • 62 proposals have been received in response to the 100 MW RFP.

Nancy Glaser, Manager Strategic Planning, Seattle City Light Municipal Utility

Mrs. Glaser is the manager of the 100 MW all renewable RFP Seattle City Light recently issued. She made the following points:

  • The utility is overwhelmed with success in terms of the healthy response of bidders.
  • The bulk of the proposals are from wind and hydro, with a handful from land fill gas, biomass, and waste treatment.
  • The challenges of evaluating and contracting with the proposals include: fast tracking projects, solving transmission constraints, and negotiating contracts.
  • From this experience, issues of importance include: getting 10 minute variable data for transmission tariff reservations and the need for deep liquid markets for transmission rights.

Panel Two: Siting Wind Developments on Native America Territories and Other Cultural Heritage Areas
What are some of the issues and lessons learned from wind developments proposed for or occurring on tribal land and other areas containing cultural resources?

Bob Gough, Inter-Tribal Council on Utility Policy
[Refer to attachment D, Bob Gough's Presentation]

Mr. Gough spoke about opportunities for tribal wind development in lands under tribal jurisdiction or proximate to tribal land. Some of his points include:

  • Developments near-reservation can be a sensitive issue, because present day reservations do not contain all the land considered important to tribes. Cultural sites in off-reservation areas should carefully be avoided.
  • Tribes generally are interested in being majority owners of wind developments on their lands. This is a different ownership structure than most developers are accustomed to.

Brison Ellinghaus, Seawest Windpower
[Refer to attachment E, Brison Ellinghaus' Presentation]

Mr. Ellinghaus gave a detailed presentation on Seawest Windpower's approach to developing wind projects on or near reservations and culturally significant native lands, including Seawest Windpower's Black Feet Project (Montana) and Foote Creek Rim Project (Wyoming). Mr. Ellinghaus offered insights into some of his company's lessons learned. Highlights from his slide outline:

Lessons Learned I:

  • Tribal Land
  • Non-Tribal Land
  • Cultural Surveys
  • Consultation:
    • adds validation
    • opportunity for appropriate ceremonies
  • Avoidance
  • Excavation:
    • "clearing", salvage, suspension (relocate)

Lessons Learned II

  • Initiate action early
  • Communicate
  • Don't Assume - ask
  • Proceed in a "good" way
  • Determine what is valued

Tribal Land:

  • Consensus Driven
  • The Tribe has Authority to dictate what, where and when
  • Good familiarity with site
    • aware of features and relative value
    • early direction of Survey process
  • Reservations distant from heritage - need discovery process

Non-Tribal Land:

  • Consensus Driven
  • Consultative process becomes paramount
  • When less familiar with a site additional review and survey work is beneficial
  • Opportunity for heritage discovery

Gordon Smith, Makaw Nation, Meah Bay, WA

Mr. Smith provide some remarks on working with tribes on wind power developments:

  • Each tribe is different in terms of customs, decision-making, resource base, and needs to be understood individually.
  • Expect different ownership structure preferences from different tribes.
  • Overall he sees this as an opportune time for tribal wind development.

Panel Three: Regional Market Issues for Wind Power
Discussion of several wind market issues and what potential opportunities and constraints they pose to regional wind development.

Randy Swisher, Executive Director, AWEA
[Refer to attachment F, Randy Swisher's Presentation]

Mr. Swisher gave a brief update on the Dec 5-6, 2000 Independent Energy Producer's Association -AWEA Conference on Intermittent Renewable Resource and the California Market.

Karen Conover, President, Global Energy Concepts
[Refer to attachment G, Karen Conover's Presentation]

Ms. Conover spoke on wind equipment supply constraint issues.

NON-RESIDENTIAL GREEN POWER DEMAND STUDY

Ed Holt, Ed Holt and Associates, Inc.
[Refer to Attachment H, Ed Holt Presentation: 'Understanding Non-Residential Demand for Green Power']

Ed Holt described the background, gave an overview of the completed study, and provided a status of the NWCC review of 'Understanding Non-Residential Demand for Green Power'. The committee then discussed possible next steps to finalize the project.

Background

  • NWCC and AWEA commissioned Mr. Holt to conduct this study to address the lack of information on the motivation of and barriers for non-residential customers to buy green power.
  • The project consists of three elements:
    • Survey of 1800 non-residential customers who are known to buy green power
    • Survey of businesses who are not buying green power, but who might be inclined to do so
    • Series of telephone interviews with high profile companies purchasing green power, for a more in-depth understanding of their experience and perspectives
  • The DRAFT report is approximately 85 pages long.
  • AWEA and NWCC are funding this paper. It is intended to be released as an NWCC consensus
    document.

Status of Consensus Review

  • The first draft of the report was reviewed by the NWCC Green Power Marketing Work Group.
     
    The following people have commented on the report:
    Laura Williams, Madison Gas and Electric
    Jeff Ford, Madison Gas and Electric
    Ron Lehr, NARUC
    Rudd Mayer, Land & Water Fund of the Rockies
    Susan Innes, Land & Water Fund of the Rockies
    Kevin Porter, NREL
    Tom Rawls, Greenmountain.com
    Kathy Belyeu, AWEA
    Steve Wiese, CSGServices Inc.

The following people were forwarded the report, but chose not to comment:
Eugene Water and Electric Board
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
Rick Walker, American Electric Power
Lynn Herrera, TXU
Martha Rollins, TVA
Rick Carson, TVA
Ron Rebenitsch, Basin Electric
Jim Edwards, East River Power Co-op
Brent Alderfer, Competitive Utility Strategies
Matthew Brown, NCSL
Jack Cadogen, DOE
Steve Clemmer, Union of Concerned Scientists
Ed DeMeo, Renewable Energy Consulting Services, Inc.
Charlie Smith, UWIG
John Saintcross, NYSERDA
Richard Sedano, Vermont Department of Public Service
Blair Swezey, NREL
Randy Swisher, AWEA
Michael Tennis, Green Marketer
Carl Weinberg, AWEA

  • The deadline for "can live with" consensus review comments on the 2nd draft was December 8, 2000. There were no objections to the report raised at the meeting nor through previous written comments. The paper is now a consensus document of the NWCC.

Action: The report will be prepared for printing, web uploading, and distribution in December and January. [Update: subsequent to the meeting all the above steps were completed and the report is being printed.]

TRANSMISSION: DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS FOR NWCC

Charlie Smith, UWIG/Electrotek Concepts, Inc., Chair NWCC Transmission Work Group
[Refer to Attachment I, Charlie Smith Presentation and Attachment J '2001 NWCC Transmission and RTO Activity Plan Update']

  • Charlie Smith presented the Transmission Work Group's revised Activity Plan for 2001. Most of the NWCC 2000 Transmission milestones were achieved. The one outstanding item is to publish the Workgroup's completed documents from it's year of investigation, including (a) the Case Studies Conclusions Summary, with the three case studies and NWCC RTO Principles as appendices; and (b) the California Wind and ISO Case Study.
  • The proposed 2001 plan update was accepted by the NWCC and will be incorporated into the NWCC 2001-003 Blueprint. The activities include:
    1. Midwest Transmission Wind Workshop
    2. Topical Issue Briefs (concurrently)
    3. Midwest RTO Updates
    4. PJM Information Memorandum
        
  • Discussion of other related transmission activities. Participants mentioned the following activities:
    • An updated Repowering the Midwest study will soon be released and will include an analysis of wind transmission issues. Both the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Environmental Law and Policy Center were involved in producing the study. The transmission analysis is available presently at www.synapseenergy.com.
    • The McKnight and Energy Foundations are providing funds for outreach and education on renewable energy and transmission issues.
    • Roger Hamilton is involved in the Western Wind Interconnection Evaluation Team as part of the Committee for Regulatory and Electric Power Cooperation (CREPC). He reports CREPC is considering conducting studies on transmission and green market issues, and they are tracking RTO West and Desert Star RTOs and targeting wind regulatory issues to raise awareness of Public Utility Commissions on wind transmission issues.
    • A transmission upgrade corridor is proposed in North Dakota and an Iowa to Chicago line is proposed.
    • Numerous grants have been made by DOE for transmission-related activities. Coordination of transmission-related grant recipients and other activities could be one of the functions of the proposed NWCC Transmission Workshop in May 2001.

Action: The work group will convene a planning committee in January for the proposed May 1-2, 2001 NWCC Upper Midwest Wind Transmission Workshop. Subsequent to meeting the NWCC Transmission Activity Plan Update was approved by the Steering Committee.

CREDIT TRADING: SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF REPORT AND PRINCIPLES

Kevin Rackstraw, Remote Power Group and Work Group Members.
[Refer to Attachment K, Kevin Rackstraw's Presentation: "NWCC Credit Trading Workshop"]

The NWCC Credit Trading Work Group held a one day meeting on December 7 to review the draft NWCC Credit Trading Report with assistance from expert peer reviewers and participants. Refer to the Credit Trading Meeting Summary for complete details [Available on this website]. A condensed summary of the key outcomes and next steps follows.

  • The comment period for Draft Two of the NWCC Credit Trading report ends December 20, 2000. Kevin Rackstraw (lead author) will incorporate written comments as well as comments received orally at the meeting and produce Draft Three by January 15, 2001. Comments should be forwarded to Kevin Rackstraw at krackstraw@compuserve.com  and Gabe Petlin at gpetlin@resolv.org.
  • The bulk of the discussion at the meeting focused on the "Recommendations" and "Guidelines" sections of the report. The "Recommendations" section will be renamed "Key Opportunities" or similar and the language will be adjusted to avoid endorsement of specific legislative policies and regulatory actions. Instead the potential impact of such measures on the wind industry will be described.
  • Additional issues remain to be resolved in the Key Opportunities and Guidelines sections. Participants felt it was important to take the time to complete these sections and eventually seek consensus from the NWCC. Within the time allowed some one-text editing of these sections was completed during the meeting. Kevin Rackstraw will incorporate additional changes into these sections for review by the Credit Trading Work Group.
  • Initial ideas of possible Outreach and Communication roles for the NWCC were discussed, but the group thought it necessary to complete key definitional issues on credit trading in the report before these roles could be fully developed for the NWCC.

NEXT STEPS:

  • A draft three will be produced by January 15, 2001.
  • Two work group conference calls will be scheduled in January and February, 2001 for workgroup members to reach closure on the "Opportunities/Guidelines" sections. If time allows these calls will address "Phase III Outreach and Communication", but completion of the Phase I and II report is the priority.
  • The workgroup will also consider recommending whether the full Credit Trading report (when complete) be put through the NWCC consensus process or be released as a resource document that requires review but not consensus to be published.
  • Draft Three with the "Opportunities/Guidelines" sections (once complete) will be sent out for final review by the full NWCC. Consensus will be sought either on the whole package or just the "Opportunities/Guidelines" section.
  • The work group will then focus on developing an Outreach and Communication Strategy (Phase III) including action steps for consideration by the NWCC.

NWCC 2001-2003 BLUE PRINT
[Refer to attachment L, "NWCC 2001-2003 Blue Print Working Draft." Found at the Inside NWCC section of the website]

NWCC Blueprint

The draft NWCC 2001-2003 Blueprint was presented and reviewed at the meeting. The activities proposed were accepted, subject to modification of pending proposed activities by certain work groups. Subsequent to the meeting it was decided that the Blueprint would be considered and "working draft" and be reviewed again at the May 10th Business Meeting.

Action: Staff will revise the blueprint to include any new activities proposed and accepted at the Business Meeting and will make the blueprint available to members.

PROJECT UPDATES

Economic Development - Update on Work Plan

  • The work group is planning to hold a one and a half day workshop March 15-16, 2001 in Minneapolis, MN to bring researchers on wind energy economic development issues together to discuss common guidelines for research and coordination of efforts.

Avian-Wind Interactions 'Perspectives' White Paper

Details of the December 6 NWCC Avian Work Group Meeting can be found in the Avian Work Group Meeting summary. Items discussed in the meeting and actions taken or underway include:

  • Status report on the WEST Avian Perspectives Paper -Draft expected in Jan, 2001.
  • Avian Work Group working towards a draft Avian Fact Sheet.
  • Avian Work Group will participate in the revision process for Siting Handbook.
  • Consultant continuing to produce Proceedings of National Avian-Wind Power Planning Meeting IV.
  • Avian Work Group to begin to develop focused outreach and communications strategy.

Siting Work Group

  • The primary focus of the work group in 2001 will be revising and updating the Sitting Handbook.
  • Conference calls and/or meetings will held in 2001 for this project.

Distributed Wind Assessment Report

  • The 'Distributed Wind Power Assessment: Summary Report.' is being prepared for printing.
  • The work group will begin to develop a Communication and Outreach Strategy on this issue for the NWCC.
  • The Blue Print calls for the development of an NWCC Issue Paper and Issue Brief on distributed wind power. The "Distributed Issues Paper" developed by Ed DeMeo and Brian Parsons could form the starting point for this.

STATE ACTIVITY UPDATES

Kansas Wind Activities Update
State Representative Tom Sloan reported on policy and project developments in his state. There is interest in exploring several policy options:

  • Tax policies that encourage wind development.
  • Net metering projects in schools where load follows wind resource; i.e. low power demand and low wind resource in summer when school is out, high power demand and good wind resource in non-summer months.
  • Adjusting property tax exemptions for wind developments. Currently there is no limit to exemptions. Local property tax revenues have proven to be a factor in gaining acceptance of wind developments in some communities, because economic benefits are spread to the wider community.

Nebraska Wind Energy Task Force Update
Abby Arnold gave an update on the Nebraska Wind Energy Task Force:

  • As follow-up to the September 20th Nebraska Wind Forum, a Governor's Task Force on Wind Energy is in the process of developing an action plan that involves strategic planning to review barriers and opportunities for wind power in their state. RESOLVE is continuing to work with the Task Force in Nebraska to 1) facilitate discussions, 2) generate questions and ideas to help work through issues, and 3) help develop a final product. A cost share arrangement is supporting this project with the bulk of the funding coming from DOE-WPA and a smaller portion coming from the NWCC to cover travel for one RESOLVE facilitator.

North Dakota Wind Activities Update
Jay Haley gave a detailed update on various wind-related activities in his state.

Publicity and Education:

  • Over 50 newspaper stories on wind energy have appeared in the state since the first wind energy conference in November 1999.
  • Jay Haley has been organizing a series of land owner meetings to educate landowners on aspects of developing wind power on their lands primarily on the model of land lease agreements with developers. Meetings have been attended by up to 300 people.

Wind Project Developments and Partnerships:

  • The Griggs Steele Empowerment Zone submitted a bid in response to a wind RFP from Xcel Energy.
  • One community has signed a deal for 25 MW of wind development. Ten other communities are in discussion with developers.
  • Three tribes are planning wind developments.
  • All 8 utilities in the state have green pricing programs underway.
  • A new 500 MW lignite coal-fire plant is proposed. Meanwhile, a memorandum of understanding has been signed between wind and coal interests to share transmission capacity and explore developing a blended wind and coal energy product.

Legislative Affairs:

  • A group of legislators is discussing wind issues and developing legislation in three proposed bills:
    1. Property Tax. Currently property taxes in the state are two and half times those in surrounding states and could act as a disincentive for wind development.
    2. Sales and Use Tax Exemption. Proponents are seeking to extend to wind the same exemption enjoyed by lignite coal.
    3. Income tax credit. Proponents are seeking income tax credits for projects on leased land as well as for projects on owner developed land, since land lease agreements have been the most popular arrangements for wind developments in the U.S.

Avian Issues in the Dakotas:

  • North and South Dakota are home to one third of the U.S. waterfowl production and the USFWS is actively purchasing tall grass prairie waterfowl habitat conservation easements from landowners across both states to protect and enhance this unique ecosystem.
  • A series of avian-wind power interaction meetings have been held with representatives of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the wind industry and its advocate allies, and bird conservation advocates. The purpose of these meetings is to assess collaboratively the compatibility of the objectives of the conservation easement program with the expected increase in wind development in the region.
  • Jay Haley reports initial results appear to be that key parties, including the waterfowl conservation group Ducks Unlimited, want to work together to insure compatibility of both activities. Mr. Haley notes that there is no published research on this issue and it may be a subject the Avian Work Group can help advise on.

South Dakota Wind Activities Update

  • Follow-up activities to the October 18-19, 2000 South Dakota Wind Conference are occurring. Requests for landowner meetings are increasing and Lisa Daniels of Windustry is responding.

Puerto Rico Wind Meeting October 31, 2000

  • Brian Parsons and Ron Lehr attended a one-day wind energy workshop in San Juan, PR on behalf of Wind Powering America. 130 people attended and NWCC publications were quickly taken by attendees.

DOE-EPA Green Tags Meeting December 13, 2000

  • DOE and EPA are holding a one-day "Green Tags 101" meeting in Washington, DC. One of the objectives was to develop initial priority issues and activities for Federal Agencies on green tags. NWCC staff will inform members when and where they can find a meeting summary and speakers notes if they become available.

OTHER NWCC BUSINESS

NWCC Protocol for Consensus and Resource Documents

  • As more NWCC products are produced, guidelines are needed to help the NWCC decide when a document is appropriate for full consensus review or release as a non-consensus "resource document."
  • Concerns have been expressed over misrepresentation of NWCC draft or resource documents by non-member parties. In one instance, the draft NWCC RTO Principles were reportedly described by a renewable energy conference speaker as an NWCC consensus product.
  • Members agreed that misuse of NWCC documents is largely out of NWCC control. However, development of protocols on the selection and use of consensus vs. resource documents would be helpful.

Action: Abby Arnold and Gabe Petlin will develop draft protocol for inclusion into the NWCC Groundrules on how to decide if an NWCC document is taken through the consensus process or released as a "resource document." Terms and definitions, usage guidelines, criteria, and disclaimer language will be developed and proposed.

2001 DOE BROAD-BASED WIND SOLICITATION

Applications are due January 10, 2001 for the DOE Broad-Based Wind Solicitation. A sub-group of the NWCC Steering Committee will meet after the Seattle Business Meeting to discuss the NWCC Blue Print and recommend whether or not to apply to the DOE Solicitation. [Subsequent to the meeting it was decided that NWCC will not apply for funds from this solicitation.]

MEETING SUMMARY ATTACHMENTS

  • Attachment A Agenda
  • Attachment B "So Why All These Wind Projects?", George Darr
  • Attachment C* "Earth Day 2000 Resolution", Heidi Wills
  • Attachment D* Bob Gough Presentation
  • Attachment E Brison Ellinghaus Presentation
  • Attachment F "IEP-AWEA Intermittent Resource Conference", Randy Swisher
  • Attachment G "Wind Equipment Supply Constraint Issues", Karen Conover
  • Attachment H "Understanding Non-Residential Demand for Green Power", Ed Holt
  • Attachment I "Transmission Workgroup Activity Plan Recommendation", Charlie Smith
  • Attachment J "2001 NWCC Transmission and RTO Plan Update"
  • Attachment K "NWCC Credit Trading Workshop", Kevin Rackstraw
  • Attachment L "NWCC 2001-2003 Blueprint Working Draft"

* Denotes attachments that are not available electronically on the NWCC website ( www.nationalwind.org ). A copy of these hard copy attachments can be obtained by contacting NWCC Staff at RESOLVE at (202) 965-6218 or nwcc@resolv.org.


National Wind Coordinating Committee
Business Meeting #24
December 6-8, 2000
Renaissance Madison Hotel
Seattle, WA 98104

Final Participants List

  • Abby Arnold
    Senior Mediator & Director of Business Development
    RESOLVE, Inc.
  • Larry Bean
    Iowa Department of Natural Resources
  • R.T. "Hap" Boyd
    Vice President, Governmental Relations
    Enron Wind Corporation
  • Karen Conover
    President
    Global Energy Concepts, Inc.
  • Lisa Daniels
    Windustry Project
  • George Darr
    Senior Engineer
    Bonneville Power Administration
  • Ed DeMeo
    Renewable Energy Consulting Services, Inc.
  • Brison R. Ellinghaus
    Vice President and Project Manager for Project Development
    SeaWest Energy Corporation
  • Nancy Glaser
    RFP Manager
    Seattle City and Light
  • Bob Gough
    Intertribal Council On Utility Policy
  • Thomas Gray
    Deputy Executive Director
    American Wind Energy Association
  • Roger Hamilton
    Commissioner
    Oregon Public Utilities Commission
  • Danielle Harder
    Landowner
  • Preston Harrison
    Coordinator
    Yakama Nation Economic Development
  • Ed Holt
    Ed Holt & Associates, Inc.
  • Michael R. Huber
    Mechanical Engineer
    Bonneville Power Administration
  • Van Jamison
    Environmental Protection Specialist
    U.S. DOE Denver Regional Office
  • Robert Kahn
    Principal
    Robert D. Kahn
  • Karen Lane
    UWIG Coordinator
    Utility Wind Interest Group, Inc.
  • Doug Larson
    Executive Director
    Western Interstate Energy Board
  • Bill Leighty
    Director
    The Leighty Foundation
  • Gabe Petlin
    Senior Outreach Coordinator
    RESOLVE, Inc.
  • Kevin Rackstraw
    Remote Power Group
  • Heather Rhoads-Weaver
    Northwest SEED - Sustainable Energy for Economic Development
  • Rachel Shimshak
    Project Director
    Renewable Northwest Project
  • Stacey Simon
    Global Energy Concepts
  • Tom Sloan
    Kansas State Representative
  • Charlie Smith
    President
    Electrotek Concepts Inc. / UWIG
  • Gordon M. Smith
    Council Member
    Makah Tribal Council
  • Randy Swisher
    Executive Director
    American Wind Energy Association
  • Ben Tansey
    Senior Contributing Editor
    Energy Newsdata

 
About NWCC | Membership | Workgroups | Meetings/Events | Publications | Resources

© 1998-2007 NATIONAL WIND COORDINATING COLLABORATIVE
Formerly known as the National Wind Coordinating Committee
c/o RESOLVE, 1255 23rd Street NW, Suite 275, Washington, DC 20037
(888) 764-WIND (202) 965-6398 fax: (202) 338-1264
Send Comments, Questions, or Suggestions to: nwcc@resolv.org