Business Meeting #24
Meeting Summary and Action Items
December 6-8, 2000
Renaissance Madison Hotel
Seattle, WA
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Facilitators: Abby Arnold and Gabe Petlin,
RESOLVE, Inc.
After introductions and adoption of the
agenda, Abby Arnold reviewed the purpose of the meeting:
- Hold a panel presentation and discussion
of several wind development issues of interest to the Northwest and
U.S.
- Have a presentation and discussion of
the draft Non-Residential Green Market Demand Study and agree on next
steps.
- Hear recommendations and rationale for
NWCC next steps on transmission.
- Discuss draft Credit Trading Report and
Principles and decide on next steps.
- Discuss the NWCC 2001 Blue Print and
agree upon activities and products.
[Refer to Attachment A for the Meeting
Agenda.]
Also note that there is a participant's
list from this meeting included at the end of this summary. Electronic
copies of presenters' slides, handouts, and reference papers (from
presenters who provide them) will be made available with the complete
final meeting summary.
FUTURE NWCC MEETING DATES
2001 NWCC Meeting Dates and Locations
[Modified subsequent to meeting to reflect current status]
March 15-16, 2001 Wind Economic Development
Workshop, Minneapolis, MN
May 1-2, 2001 Upper Midwest Wind Transmission Workshop, Minneapolis, MN
May 10, 2001 NWCC Business Meeting #25, Washington, DC
July TBD 2001 New York State Wind Forum, TBD, New York
July TBD 2001 MA or New England Wind Forum, TBD, MA
September 26, 2001 NWCC Business Meeting #26, Montana
December 6, 2001 NWCC Business Meeting #27, New Mexico
DINNER PANEL DISCUSSION WITH RENEWABLES NORTHWEST
BOARD MEMBERS AND REGIONAL GUESTS
Panel presentations and discussion of several wind development issues
of interest to the Northwest.
Opening Remarks: Picture of Wind
Development in the Northwest and Opportunities Ahead
Rachel Shimshak, Executive Director, Renewables Northwest Project
[Refer to weblink www.rnp.org, for the Renewable's Northwest Project (RNP)
publication "Powerful Choices."
Rachel Shimshak described the landscape of
power generation and opportunities for renewable energy in the Northwest.
The Northwest is powered by about 40% fossil fuels and a large amount of
hydro. Until recent energy price fluctuations the region traditionally
enjoyed low cost electricity. Wind power has been making a lot of progress
in recent months. Mrs. Shimshak described the efforts of RNP as a
combination of "programs, policies, and persistence" aimed at
promoting renewables.
Panel One: Factors for Wind Development
in the Northwest
What are some examples and reasons for recent wind development activity in
the Northwest?
George Darr, Manager of Renewable
Resources, Bonneville Power Authority
[Refer to attachment B, George Darr's Presentation]
Mr. Darr sites three factors driving the
boom in wind power in the Northwest:
1. Demand for electricity is expected to
grow.
2. The cost of wind power is declining.
3. Natural gas prices are rising.
Heidi Wills, Seattle City Council
Member, Chair of Energy and Environmental Policy Committee
[Refer to attachment C, Council Member Heidi Will's Presentation]
Both Council Member Wills and Nancy Glaser
spoke about different aspects of Seattle City Light Municipal Utility's
RFP for 100 MW of 100% renewable power recently issued.
- The region has seen the price of
electricity? go from $20 per MWhr to $8,000 per MWhr.
- Utility has a customer load base of
1,200 MW.
- Seattle City Light did a poll of their
customers to understand their preferences.
- The policy decision was to meet Seattle
City Light's energy needs with no net green house gas (GHG) emissions.
- 62 proposals have been received in
response to the 100 MW RFP.
Nancy Glaser, Manager Strategic
Planning, Seattle City Light Municipal Utility
Mrs. Glaser is the manager of the 100 MW
all renewable RFP Seattle City Light recently issued. She made the
following points:
- The utility is overwhelmed with success
in terms of the healthy response of bidders.
- The bulk of the proposals are from wind
and hydro, with a handful from land fill gas, biomass, and waste
treatment.
- The challenges of evaluating and
contracting with the proposals include: fast tracking projects,
solving transmission constraints, and negotiating contracts.
- From this experience, issues of
importance include: getting 10 minute variable data for transmission
tariff reservations and the need for deep liquid markets for
transmission rights.
Panel Two: Siting Wind Developments on
Native America Territories and Other Cultural Heritage Areas
What are some of the issues and lessons learned from wind developments
proposed for or occurring on tribal land and other areas containing
cultural resources?
Bob Gough, Inter-Tribal Council on
Utility Policy
[Refer to attachment D, Bob Gough's Presentation]
Mr. Gough spoke about opportunities for
tribal wind development in lands under tribal jurisdiction or proximate to
tribal land. Some of his points include:
- Developments near-reservation can be a
sensitive issue, because present day reservations do not contain all
the land considered important to tribes. Cultural sites in
off-reservation areas should carefully be avoided.
- Tribes generally are interested in being
majority owners of wind developments on their lands. This is a
different ownership structure than most developers are accustomed to.
Brison Ellinghaus, Seawest Windpower
[Refer to attachment E, Brison Ellinghaus' Presentation]
Mr. Ellinghaus gave a detailed presentation
on Seawest Windpower's approach to developing wind projects on or near
reservations and culturally significant native lands, including Seawest
Windpower's Black Feet Project (Montana) and Foote Creek Rim Project
(Wyoming). Mr. Ellinghaus offered insights into some of his company's
lessons learned. Highlights from his slide outline:
Lessons Learned I:
- Tribal Land
- Non-Tribal Land
- Cultural Surveys
- Consultation:
- adds validation
- opportunity for appropriate
ceremonies
- Avoidance
- Excavation:
- "clearing", salvage,
suspension (relocate)
Lessons Learned II
- Initiate action early
- Communicate
- Don't Assume - ask
- Proceed in a "good" way
- Determine what is valued
Tribal Land:
- Consensus Driven
- The Tribe has Authority to dictate
what, where and when
- Good familiarity with site
- aware of features and relative
value
- early direction of Survey process
- Reservations distant from heritage -
need discovery process
Non-Tribal Land:
- Consensus Driven
- Consultative process becomes paramount
- When less familiar with a site
additional review and survey work is beneficial
- Opportunity for heritage discovery
Gordon Smith, Makaw Nation, Meah Bay, WA
Mr. Smith provide some remarks on working
with tribes on wind power developments:
- Each tribe is different in terms of
customs, decision-making, resource base, and needs to be understood
individually.
- Expect different ownership structure
preferences from different tribes.
- Overall he sees this as an opportune
time for tribal wind development.
Panel Three: Regional Market Issues for
Wind Power
Discussion of several wind market issues and what potential
opportunities and constraints they pose to regional wind development.
Randy Swisher, Executive Director, AWEA
[Refer to attachment F, Randy Swisher's Presentation]
Mr. Swisher gave a brief update on the Dec
5-6, 2000 Independent Energy Producer's Association -AWEA Conference on
Intermittent Renewable Resource and the California Market.
Karen Conover, President, Global Energy
Concepts
[Refer to attachment G, Karen Conover's Presentation]
Ms. Conover spoke on wind equipment supply
constraint issues.
NON-RESIDENTIAL GREEN POWER DEMAND STUDY
Ed Holt, Ed Holt and Associates, Inc.
[Refer to Attachment H, Ed Holt Presentation: 'Understanding
Non-Residential Demand for Green Power']
Ed Holt described the background, gave an
overview of the completed study, and provided a status of the NWCC review
of 'Understanding Non-Residential Demand for Green Power'. The committee
then discussed possible next steps to finalize the project.
Background
- NWCC and AWEA commissioned Mr. Holt to
conduct this study to address the lack of information on the
motivation of and barriers for non-residential customers to buy green
power.
- The project consists of three elements:
- Survey of 1800 non-residential
customers who are known to buy green power
- Survey of businesses who are not
buying green power, but who might be inclined to do so
- Series of telephone interviews with
high profile companies purchasing green power, for a more in-depth
understanding of their experience and perspectives
- The DRAFT report is approximately 85
pages long.
- AWEA and NWCC are funding this paper. It
is intended to be released as an NWCC consensus
document.
Status of Consensus Review
- The first draft of the report was
reviewed by the NWCC Green Power Marketing Work Group.
The following people have commented on the report:
Laura Williams, Madison Gas and Electric
Jeff Ford, Madison Gas and Electric
Ron Lehr, NARUC
Rudd Mayer, Land & Water Fund of the Rockies
Susan Innes, Land & Water Fund of the Rockies
Kevin Porter, NREL
Tom Rawls, Greenmountain.com
Kathy Belyeu, AWEA
Steve Wiese, CSGServices Inc.
The following people were forwarded
the report, but chose not to comment:
Eugene Water and Electric Board
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
Rick Walker, American Electric Power
Lynn Herrera, TXU
Martha Rollins, TVA
Rick Carson, TVA
Ron Rebenitsch, Basin Electric
Jim Edwards, East River Power Co-op
Brent Alderfer, Competitive Utility Strategies
Matthew Brown, NCSL
Jack Cadogen, DOE
Steve Clemmer, Union of Concerned Scientists
Ed DeMeo, Renewable Energy Consulting Services, Inc.
Charlie Smith, UWIG
John Saintcross, NYSERDA
Richard Sedano, Vermont Department of Public Service
Blair Swezey, NREL
Randy Swisher, AWEA
Michael Tennis, Green Marketer
Carl Weinberg, AWEA
- The deadline for "can live
with" consensus review comments on the 2nd draft was December 8,
2000. There were no objections to the report raised at the meeting nor
through previous written comments. The paper is now a consensus
document of the NWCC.
Action: The report will be prepared
for printing, web uploading, and distribution in December and January.
[Update: subsequent to the meeting all the above steps were completed and
the report is being printed.]
TRANSMISSION: DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDED NEXT
STEPS FOR NWCC
Charlie Smith, UWIG/Electrotek Concepts,
Inc., Chair NWCC Transmission Work Group
[Refer to Attachment I, Charlie Smith Presentation and Attachment J '2001
NWCC Transmission and RTO Activity Plan Update']
- Charlie Smith presented the Transmission
Work Group's revised Activity Plan for 2001. Most of the NWCC 2000
Transmission milestones were achieved. The one outstanding item is to
publish the Workgroup's completed documents from it's year of
investigation, including (a) the Case Studies Conclusions Summary,
with the three case studies and NWCC RTO Principles as appendices; and
(b) the California Wind and ISO Case Study.
- The proposed 2001 plan update was
accepted by the NWCC and will be incorporated into the NWCC 2001-003
Blueprint. The activities include:
- Midwest Transmission Wind Workshop
- Topical Issue Briefs (concurrently)
- Midwest RTO Updates
- PJM Information Memorandum
- Discussion of other related transmission
activities. Participants mentioned the following activities:
- An updated Repowering the Midwest
study will soon be released and will include an analysis of wind
transmission issues. Both the Union of Concerned Scientists and
the Environmental Law and Policy Center were involved in producing
the study. The transmission analysis is available presently at www.synapseenergy.com.
- The McKnight and Energy Foundations
are providing funds for outreach and education on renewable energy
and transmission issues.
- Roger Hamilton is involved in the
Western Wind Interconnection Evaluation Team as part of the
Committee for Regulatory and Electric Power Cooperation (CREPC).
He reports CREPC is considering conducting studies on transmission
and green market issues, and they are tracking RTO West and Desert
Star RTOs and targeting wind regulatory issues to raise awareness
of Public Utility Commissions on wind transmission issues.
- A transmission upgrade corridor is
proposed in North Dakota and an Iowa to Chicago line is proposed.
- Numerous grants have been made by
DOE for transmission-related activities. Coordination of
transmission-related grant recipients and other activities could
be one of the functions of the proposed NWCC Transmission Workshop
in May 2001.
Action: The work group will convene
a planning committee in January for the proposed May 1-2, 2001 NWCC Upper
Midwest Wind Transmission Workshop. Subsequent to meeting the NWCC
Transmission Activity Plan Update was approved by the Steering Committee.
CREDIT TRADING: SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF REPORT
AND PRINCIPLES
Kevin Rackstraw, Remote Power Group and
Work Group Members.
[Refer to Attachment K, Kevin Rackstraw's Presentation: "NWCC
Credit Trading Workshop"]
The NWCC Credit Trading Work Group held a
one day meeting on December 7 to review the draft NWCC Credit Trading
Report with assistance from expert peer reviewers and participants. Refer
to the Credit Trading Meeting Summary for complete details [Available on
this website]. A condensed summary of the key outcomes and next steps
follows.
- The comment period for Draft Two of the
NWCC Credit Trading report ends December 20, 2000. Kevin Rackstraw
(lead author) will incorporate written comments as well as comments
received orally at the meeting and produce Draft Three by January 15,
2001. Comments should be forwarded to Kevin Rackstraw at krackstraw@compuserve.com
and Gabe Petlin at gpetlin@resolv.org.
- The bulk of the discussion at the
meeting focused on the "Recommendations" and
"Guidelines" sections of the report. The
"Recommendations" section will be renamed "Key
Opportunities" or similar and the language will be adjusted to
avoid endorsement of specific legislative policies and regulatory
actions. Instead the potential impact of such measures on the wind
industry will be described.
- Additional issues remain to be resolved
in the Key Opportunities and Guidelines sections. Participants felt it
was important to take the time to complete these sections and
eventually seek consensus from the NWCC. Within the time allowed some
one-text editing of these sections was completed during the meeting.
Kevin Rackstraw will incorporate additional changes into these
sections for review by the Credit Trading Work Group.
- Initial ideas of possible Outreach and
Communication roles for the NWCC were discussed, but the group thought
it necessary to complete key definitional issues on credit trading in
the report before these roles could be fully developed for the NWCC.
NEXT STEPS:
- A draft three will be produced by
January 15, 2001.
- Two work group conference calls will be
scheduled in January and February, 2001 for workgroup members to reach
closure on the "Opportunities/Guidelines" sections. If time
allows these calls will address "Phase III Outreach and
Communication", but completion of the Phase I and II report is
the priority.
- The workgroup will also consider
recommending whether the full Credit Trading report (when complete) be
put through the NWCC consensus process or be released as a resource
document that requires review but not consensus to be published.
- Draft Three with the
"Opportunities/Guidelines" sections (once complete) will be
sent out for final review by the full NWCC. Consensus will be sought
either on the whole package or just the
"Opportunities/Guidelines" section.
- The work group will then focus on
developing an Outreach and Communication Strategy (Phase III)
including action steps for consideration by the NWCC.
NWCC 2001-2003 BLUE PRINT
[Refer to attachment L, "NWCC
2001-2003 Blue Print Working Draft." Found at the Inside NWCC section
of the website]
NWCC Blueprint
The draft NWCC 2001-2003 Blueprint was
presented and reviewed at the meeting. The activities proposed were
accepted, subject to modification of pending proposed activities by
certain work groups. Subsequent to the meeting it was decided that the
Blueprint would be considered and "working draft" and be
reviewed again at the May 10th Business Meeting.
Action: Staff will revise the
blueprint to include any new activities proposed and accepted at the
Business Meeting and will make the blueprint available to members.
PROJECT UPDATES
Economic Development - Update on Work
Plan
- The work group is planning to hold a one
and a half day workshop March 15-16, 2001 in Minneapolis, MN to bring
researchers on wind energy economic development issues together to
discuss common guidelines for research and coordination of efforts.
Avian-Wind Interactions 'Perspectives'
White Paper
Details of the December 6 NWCC Avian Work
Group Meeting can be found in the Avian Work Group Meeting summary. Items
discussed in the meeting and actions taken or underway include:
- Status report on the WEST Avian
Perspectives Paper -Draft expected in Jan, 2001.
- Avian Work Group working towards a draft
Avian Fact Sheet.
- Avian Work Group will participate in the
revision process for Siting Handbook.
- Consultant continuing to produce
Proceedings of National Avian-Wind Power Planning Meeting IV.
- Avian Work Group to begin to develop
focused outreach and communications strategy.
Siting Work Group
- The primary focus of the work group in
2001 will be revising and updating the Sitting Handbook.
- Conference calls and/or meetings will
held in 2001 for this project.
Distributed Wind Assessment Report
- The 'Distributed Wind Power Assessment:
Summary Report.' is being prepared for printing.
- The work group will begin to develop a
Communication and Outreach Strategy on this issue for the NWCC.
- The Blue Print calls for the development
of an NWCC Issue Paper and Issue Brief on distributed wind power. The
"Distributed Issues Paper" developed by Ed DeMeo and Brian
Parsons could form the starting point for this.
STATE ACTIVITY UPDATES
Kansas Wind Activities Update
State Representative Tom Sloan reported on policy and project developments
in his state. There is interest in exploring several policy options:
- Tax policies that encourage wind
development.
- Net metering projects in schools where
load follows wind resource; i.e. low power demand and low wind
resource in summer when school is out, high power demand and good wind
resource in non-summer months.
- Adjusting property tax exemptions for
wind developments. Currently there is no limit to exemptions. Local
property tax revenues have proven to be a factor in gaining acceptance
of wind developments in some communities, because economic benefits
are spread to the wider community.
Nebraska Wind Energy Task Force Update
Abby Arnold gave an update on the Nebraska Wind Energy Task Force:
- As follow-up to the September 20th
Nebraska Wind Forum, a Governor's Task Force on Wind Energy is in the
process of developing an action plan that involves strategic planning
to review barriers and opportunities for wind power in their state.
RESOLVE is continuing to work with the Task Force in Nebraska to 1)
facilitate discussions, 2) generate questions and ideas to help work
through issues, and 3) help develop a final product. A cost share
arrangement is supporting this project with the bulk of the funding
coming from DOE-WPA and a smaller portion coming from the NWCC to
cover travel for one RESOLVE facilitator.
North Dakota Wind Activities Update
Jay Haley gave a detailed update on various wind-related activities in his
state.
Publicity and Education:
- Over 50 newspaper stories on wind energy
have appeared in the state since the first wind energy conference in
November 1999.
- Jay Haley has been organizing a series
of land owner meetings to educate landowners on aspects of developing
wind power on their lands primarily on the model of land lease
agreements with developers. Meetings have been attended by up to 300
people.
Wind Project Developments and
Partnerships:
- The Griggs Steele Empowerment Zone
submitted a bid in response to a wind RFP from Xcel Energy.
- One community has signed a deal for 25
MW of wind development. Ten other communities are in discussion with
developers.
- Three tribes are planning wind
developments.
- All 8 utilities in the state have green
pricing programs underway.
- A new 500 MW lignite coal-fire plant is
proposed. Meanwhile, a memorandum of understanding has been signed
between wind and coal interests to share transmission capacity and
explore developing a blended wind and coal energy product.
Legislative Affairs:
- A group of legislators is discussing
wind issues and developing legislation in three proposed bills:
- Property Tax. Currently property
taxes in the state are two and half times those in surrounding
states and could act as a disincentive for wind development.
- Sales and Use Tax Exemption.
Proponents are seeking to extend to wind the same exemption
enjoyed by lignite coal.
- Income tax credit. Proponents are
seeking income tax credits for projects on leased land as well as
for projects on owner developed land, since land lease agreements
have been the most popular arrangements for wind developments in
the U.S.
Avian Issues in the Dakotas:
- North and South Dakota are home to one
third of the U.S. waterfowl production and the USFWS is actively
purchasing tall grass prairie waterfowl habitat conservation easements
from landowners across both states to protect and enhance this unique
ecosystem.
- A series of avian-wind power interaction
meetings have been held with representatives of the US Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), the wind industry and its advocate allies,
and bird conservation advocates. The purpose of these meetings is to
assess collaboratively the compatibility of the objectives of the
conservation easement program with the expected increase in wind
development in the region.
- Jay Haley reports initial results appear
to be that key parties, including the waterfowl conservation group
Ducks Unlimited, want to work together to insure compatibility of both
activities. Mr. Haley notes that there is no published research on
this issue and it may be a subject the Avian Work Group can help
advise on.
South Dakota Wind Activities Update
- Follow-up activities to the October
18-19, 2000 South Dakota Wind Conference are occurring. Requests for
landowner meetings are increasing and Lisa Daniels of Windustry is
responding.
Puerto Rico Wind Meeting October 31,
2000
- Brian Parsons and Ron Lehr attended a
one-day wind energy workshop in San Juan, PR on behalf of Wind
Powering America. 130 people attended and NWCC publications were
quickly taken by attendees.
DOE-EPA Green Tags Meeting December 13,
2000
- DOE and EPA are holding a one-day
"Green Tags 101" meeting in Washington, DC. One of the
objectives was to develop initial priority issues and activities for
Federal Agencies on green tags. NWCC staff will inform members when
and where they can find a meeting summary and speakers notes if they
become available.
OTHER NWCC BUSINESS
NWCC Protocol for Consensus and Resource
Documents
- As more NWCC products are produced,
guidelines are needed to help the NWCC decide when a document is
appropriate for full consensus review or release as a non-consensus
"resource document."
- Concerns have been expressed over
misrepresentation of NWCC draft or resource documents by non-member
parties. In one instance, the draft NWCC RTO Principles were
reportedly described by a renewable energy conference speaker as an
NWCC consensus product.
- Members agreed that misuse of NWCC
documents is largely out of NWCC control. However, development of
protocols on the selection and use of consensus vs. resource documents
would be helpful.
Action: Abby Arnold and Gabe Petlin
will develop draft protocol for inclusion into the NWCC Groundrules on how
to decide if an NWCC document is taken through the consensus process or
released as a "resource document." Terms and definitions, usage
guidelines, criteria, and disclaimer language will be developed and
proposed.
2001 DOE BROAD-BASED WIND SOLICITATION
Applications are due January 10, 2001 for
the DOE Broad-Based Wind Solicitation. A sub-group of the NWCC Steering
Committee will meet after the Seattle Business Meeting to discuss the NWCC
Blue Print and recommend whether or not to apply to the DOE Solicitation.
[Subsequent to the meeting it was decided that NWCC will not apply for
funds from this solicitation.]
MEETING SUMMARY ATTACHMENTS
- Attachment A Agenda
-
Attachment B "So Why All These Wind Projects?", George Darr
- Attachment C* "Earth Day 2000 Resolution", Heidi Wills
- Attachment D* Bob Gough Presentation
-
Attachment E Brison Ellinghaus Presentation
-
Attachment F "IEP-AWEA Intermittent Resource Conference", Randy
Swisher
-
Attachment G "Wind Equipment Supply Constraint Issues", Karen
Conover
-
Attachment H "Understanding Non-Residential Demand for Green
Power", Ed Holt
-
Attachment I "Transmission Workgroup Activity Plan
Recommendation", Charlie Smith
-
Attachment J "2001 NWCC Transmission and RTO Plan Update"
-
Attachment K "NWCC Credit Trading Workshop", Kevin Rackstraw
-
Attachment L "NWCC 2001-2003 Blueprint Working Draft"
* Denotes attachments that are not
available electronically on the NWCC website ( www.nationalwind.org
). A copy of these hard copy attachments can be obtained by contacting
NWCC Staff at RESOLVE at (202) 965-6218 or
nwcc@resolv.org.
National Wind Coordinating Committee
Business Meeting #24
December 6-8, 2000
Renaissance Madison Hotel
Seattle, WA 98104
Final Participants List
- Abby Arnold
Senior Mediator & Director of Business Development
RESOLVE, Inc.
- Larry Bean
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
- R.T. "Hap" Boyd
Vice President, Governmental Relations
Enron Wind Corporation
- Karen Conover
President
Global Energy Concepts, Inc.
- Lisa Daniels
Windustry Project
- George Darr
Senior Engineer
Bonneville Power Administration
- Ed DeMeo
Renewable Energy Consulting Services, Inc.
- Brison R. Ellinghaus
Vice President and Project Manager for Project Development
SeaWest Energy Corporation
- Nancy Glaser
RFP Manager
Seattle City and Light
- Bob Gough
Intertribal Council On Utility Policy
- Thomas Gray
Deputy Executive Director
American Wind Energy Association
- Roger Hamilton
Commissioner
Oregon Public Utilities Commission
- Danielle Harder
Landowner
- Preston Harrison
Coordinator
Yakama Nation Economic Development
- Ed Holt
Ed Holt & Associates, Inc.
- Michael R. Huber
Mechanical Engineer
Bonneville Power Administration
- Van Jamison
Environmental Protection Specialist
U.S. DOE Denver Regional Office
- Robert Kahn
Principal
Robert D. Kahn
- Karen Lane
UWIG Coordinator
Utility Wind Interest Group, Inc.
- Doug Larson
Executive Director
Western Interstate Energy Board
- Bill Leighty
Director
The Leighty Foundation
- Gabe Petlin
Senior Outreach Coordinator
RESOLVE, Inc.
- Kevin Rackstraw
Remote Power Group
- Heather Rhoads-Weaver
Northwest SEED - Sustainable Energy for Economic Development
- Rachel Shimshak
Project Director
Renewable Northwest Project
- Stacey Simon
Global Energy Concepts
- Tom Sloan
Kansas State Representative
- Charlie Smith
President
Electrotek Concepts Inc. / UWIG
- Gordon M. Smith
Council Member
Makah Tribal Council
- Randy Swisher
Executive Director
American Wind Energy Association
- Ben Tansey
Senior Contributing Editor
Energy Newsdata
|